Escrow Institute of California v. Pierno
California Court of Appeal
What it shows
On judgment on the pleadings, the court rejected a constitutional equal-protection challenge under rational-basis review. It accepted existing regulation as a conceivable reason for different treatment; it did not empirically establish modern equivalence or original subjective intent.
- Authority class
- Published case; nonofficial online reproduction
- Document type
- Published judicial decision
- Archive status
- Reporter citation controls; linked Justia copy is not an official reporter reproduction
- What Escrowpedia preserved
- Citation, procedural posture, reporter pins, and claim treatment preserved.
- Completeness
- Full opinion reviewed. Comprehensive current citator and later-treatment check remains outstanding.
- Where to look
- 24 Cal.App.3d 361, 363–370
- Used in
- FIN § 17006